Editor-in-Chief Hatice Kübra Elçioğlu Vice Editors Levent Kabasakal Esra Tatar Online ISSN 2630-6344 Publisher Marmara University Frequency Bimonthly (Six issues / year) Abbreviation J.Res.Pharm. Former Name Marmara Pharmaceutical Journal
Journal of Research in Pharmacy 2011 , Vol 15 , Num 1
A linear relationship between lamotrigine and GABA in cerebrospinal fluid
Berna Terzioğlu, Atilla Karaalp, M. Zafer Gören
Marmara University, Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Haydarpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey DOI : 10.12991/201115437

Summary

γ-amino bütirik asit aracılığıyla oluşan sinir iletisi, anksiyete, uyku bozukluğu, depresyon ve bipolar hastalık gibi durumların tedavisinde kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı Wistar albino sıçanlara akut lamotrijin uygulamasının, beyin omurilik sıvısındaki GABA ve L-glutamik asit düzeylerine nasıl etki ettiğine ve olası etkilerin kolinerjik sistemle ilişkisine dair /nörokimyasal kanıt sağlamaktır. Konsantrik mikrodiyaliz problarının lateral ventriküllere yerleştirilmesinden bir gün sonra uyanık hayvan modelinde mikrodiyaliz deneyleri yapıldı. Sıçanlara fizyolojik tuzlu su veya 20 mg/kg lamotrijin uygulaması yapıldı. Kolinerjik katılımı göstermek için 0.5 mg/kg fizostigmin veya 2 mg/kg atropin sülfat ön uygulamaları lamotrijin enjeksiyonundan önce uygulandı. Toplanan diyalizatlarda GABA, L-glutamik asit ve lamotrijin düzeyleri yüksek performanslı sıvı kromatografisi ile analiz edildi. Fizyolojik tuzlu su, GABA veya L-glutamik asit düzeyinde bir etki oluşturmazken, lamotrijin anlamlı derecede GABA düzeyini artırdı (p<0,05). Fizostigmin veya atropin ön uygulamaları lamotrijinle indüklenen GABA atışı üzerine bir etki oluşturmadı. Bu sonuçlar lamotrijinin farmakolojik etkilerinde GABA'nın katılımının olduğunu ve aralarında lineer bir ilişki bulunduğunu göstermektedir. Santral kolinerjik sistem lamotrijin ile indüklenen bu etkiye katılmamaktadır.

Introduction

Lamotrigine as a comparatively novel antiepileptic agent is now being used widely as a drug of first choice in certain seizure types including Lennaux Gestaut syndrome, grand or petit mal seizures and myoclonus[1-8]. Lamotrigine has also been extensively preferred for bipolar disorders[9,10,11]. γ-amino butyric acid (GABA) is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain and low GABAergic activity has been implicated in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder[12,13]. Previous studies indicated that GABAergic potentiation plays role in the effects of lamotrigine in addition to its anti-glutamergic effects[14,15].

Lamotrigine reduces glutamate and aspartate release through inhibiting Na+ channels and thus causing inhibition of exocytosis of these excitatory amino acids[16]. The role for inhibition of Ca2+ channels was also demonstrated[17-19].

Prior studies performed in rat entorhinal cortex using whole patch clamped cells demonstrated that lamotrigine produces reductions in glutamate and increases in GABA release without affecting Na+ or Ca2+ channels[20,21]. It was also reported that lamotrigine also suppresses GABAA-mediated neurotransmission in rat amygdala cells through affecting presynaptic Ca2+ influx[22]. Lamotrigine also decreases veratrineor electrically stimulated release of endogenous glutamate and [3H]-GABA, [3H]-5-hydroxytriptamine and [3H]-dopamine in rat cortical slices[17]. However, ex vivo studies documented that acute lamotrigine did not produce an effect on hippocampal tissue content of GABA or taurine but both were increased following chronic treatment with the drug[23].

In central nervous system, the interaction between cholinergic system and GABAergic transmission is long studied. Previous in vivo and in vitro studies also demonstrated that GABA and its analogues directly inhibit cortical acetylcholine release in the freely moving guinea pig and in electrically stimulated slices[24,25]. Local inhibitory effects of acetylcholine have been ascribed to the excitation of GABAergic inter neurons in the cerebral cortex[26] but some findings suggested that acetylcholine exerts direct inhibitory effects on GABA release at least in other brain areas[27,28] and in the periphery[29].

The aim of this study is to monitor the time-course changes of GABA and L-glutamic acid in rat cerebrospinal fluid produced by lamotrigine treatment by measuring the amino acids dialyzed through microdialysis probes implanted into lateral ventricles of conscious rats and secondly to show the possible modulatory effect of cholinergic system on the lamotrigineinduced amino acid release.

Methods

1. Animals and laboratory
Wistar albino rats weighing 250-275 g of both sexes supplied from Marmara University, Experimental Research and Animal Laboratory were used. An approval of Marmara University Ethical Committee for Experimental Animals was taken before the experiments (16.12.2005 - 63.2005.mar). The animals were kept in a temperature-controlled room with 12-h light and dark cycle and fed with standard animal food and water ad libitum.

2. Drugs used in the study
All drugs were supplied from Sigma Chemical (USA) except lamotrigine (supplied kindly from GlaxoSmithKline, Turkey). Lamotrigine was dissolved physiological saline prior to injection.

3. Stereotaxic surgery and microdialysis
Concentric microdialysis probes were used as as described previously[30]. The rats were anesthetized with intraperitoneal ketamine (100 mg/kg) and chlorpromazine (1.0 mg/kg) mixture and placed in a stereotaxic frame (Stoelting, Model 51600, USA). The scalp skin was incised and the periosteum was separated from the cranium. Probe was implanted into the right lateral ventricle (lateral ventricle coordinates; 1.0 mm posterior to bregma, 1.5 mm lateral to midline and 3.8 mm ventral to the skull surface) according to the Paxinos and Watson rat brain atlas[31]. Supporting screws were also placed and the microdialysis probe was covered together with the screws with dental acrylic cement. The collection of intracerebral perfusion samples was performed 24 h following surgery.

The day after the placement of microdialysis probes, polyethylene tubings were attached to the inlet of the microdialysis probes to collect the samples in conscious rat model in a plexyglass cage (42X42X20 cm). Artificial cerebrospinal fluid was delivered continuously via 250 μl hamilton syringe which was connected to a microinfusion pump (KD Scientific, USA). The composition of artificial cerebrospinal fluid was 2.5 mM KCl, 125 mM NaCl, 1.26 mM CaCl22H2O, 1.18 mM MgCl26H2O and 0.2 mM NaH2PO42H2O and the pH was set to 7. The artificial cerebrospinal fluid was filtered through 0.4 μm nylon membrane filters.

Two basal samples were collected at 0.5 μl/minute flow rate every 40 min in a 0.25 ml ependorf tubes from Wistar rats after an equilibration period of 1 h. After collection of basal samples, intraperitoneal physiological saline injection was administered and five more consecutive samples were collected. The same protocol was repeated with lamotrigine (20 mg/kg), physostigmine (0.5 mg/kg) or atropine sulfate (2 mg/kg). The dialysates were divided into two equal ependorf tubes for different High Performance Liquid Chromatography analysis methods and kept at -80ºC.

Throughout the microdialysis procedure, the rats were observed and atypical behaviors were noted. The rats were anesthetized with ether and methylene blue was injected through the probe and decapitated. The brains were sliced with a blade to observe the dye in the ventricles for verification of probe placement. Only the proper experiments were used in data analysis.

4. Chromatographic system and High Performance Liquid Chromatography analysis of L-glutamic acid and GABA in the cerebrospinal fluid dialysates
Chromatographic system for analysis of L-glutamic acid and GABA (supplied from Sigma, USA) consists of a gradient pump (Agilent 1100, Germany) with four solvent bottles, degasser module, C18 reverse phase nucleosil column (15 cm and 3.9 cm length, 4.6 mm diameter and 5 μm pore size), autosampler unit, fluorescent detector with excitation and emission wave lengths set to 360 nm and 410 nm respectively and a computer. The composition of mobile phase and chromatographic procedures were performed as described previously[32].

5. Lamotrigine and amino acid High Performance Liquid Chromatography analysis
The isocratic High Performance Liquid Chromatography system for lamotrigine analysis consists of a 100 μl loop, rheodyne valve with a pump (Jasco PU 980, Tokyo, Japan), C18 reverse phase colon (15 cm length, 4.6 μm diameter and 5 mm pore size), UV detector (Jasco UV 975, Tokyo, Japan) wave length set to 214 nm and a computer. The chromatographic analysis was carried out with a software (Borwin Chromatograph, version 1.2, France). The mobile phase is a mixture of 0.1 M KH- 2PO4 (pH: 6.7), acetonitrile and methanol (7:2:1, v/v/v). The flow rate of the pump was set to 1.3 ml/min. Manual injections were given within a volume of 10 μl at room temperature. The retention time of lamotrigine was 4.5 min. Total duration of the chromatogram was 15 min.

6. Statistical analysis
All data are expressed as means ± s.e.m. The effect of saline or drug treatment on amino acids were tested using Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn's Multiple Comparison Test. The relationship between the lamotrigine and GABA concentrations in the CSF dialysates was determined by Pearson's test (alpha = 0.05). Two-tailed Student's t-test for unpaired data was used to determine the differences between the basal percent change of GABA after physostigmine or atropine sulfate injections. Statistical significance was accepted where p<0.05.

Results

1. The effect of lamotrigine injection on GABA and L-glutamic acid in cerebrospinal fluid dialysates
The basal levels of L-glutamic acid and GABA in the cerebrospinal fluid dialysates prior to physiological saline injection were found to be 2.35 ± 0.42 mM and 0.16 ± 0.01 mM, respectively. Physiological saline injection produced no significant difference either in L-glutamic acid or GABA levels (Figure 1A and 1B; p=0.565 and p=0.789). Lamotrigine injection did not affect L-glutamic acid levels (Figure 1C; p=0.922) but produced increases in GABA level yielding significant differences in [40- 80]-, [80-120] - and [120-160]-min sampling intervals when compared to [-40-0]-min (basal) sample (p<0.001, p<0.001 and p<0.01, respectively; Figure 1D).


Click Here to Zoom
FIGURE 1: The effect of intraperitoneal physiological saline injection on L-glutamic acid (A) and GABA (B) levels in cerebrospinal fluid dialysates collected from the right lateral ventricle of Wistar rats (n=10). Lamotrigine (LTG) was administered at a dose of 20 mg/kg and its effects on L-glutamic acid and GABA are presented in C and D, respectively (n=10). *p<0.01 **p<0.001 (compared to [-40-0]-min (basal) sample)

2. The relationship between GABA and lamotrigine levels in the cerebrospinal fluid dialysates
Lamotrigine started to appear in [0-40] min samples following intraperitoneal injection, and reached a peak at [80-120]-min period and the levels started to decline in the samples collected afterward (Figure 2). When GABA and lamotrigine concentrations measured within the same sampling periods are plotted and a linear relationship between the drug and GABA was recognized (Figure 3; p=0.0122, alpha=0.05).


Click Here to Zoom
FIGURE 2: The time course change in lamotrigine (LTG) concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid dialysates following intraperitoneal injection. *p<0.01 **p<0.001 (compared to [-40-0] min (basal) sample)


Click Here to Zoom
FIGURE 3: The relationship between GABA and lamotrigine (LTG) levels in the cerebrospinal fluid dialysates. Data points represent the mean of concentrations in corresponding sampling intervals (n=10; Pearson test, p=0.0122, alpha=0.05).

3. The effect of physostigmine or atropine on lamotrigineinduced GABA response in cerebrospinal fluid dialysates
When cholinomimetic physostigmine was injected intraperitoneally at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg, a tendency to decrease in the GABA level of [0-40]-min sample was observed, but this did not yield a statistically significant difference (p =0.252). Nonselective muscarinic antagonist atropine (2 mg/kg) also produced non-significant increases in GABA [0-40]-min sample after atropine sulfate injection. Likewise, this increase did not yield a statistically significant difference (p=0.1023).

In order to analyze the involvement of cholinergic system in the lamotrigine induced GABA response, lamotrigine injections were given to physostigmine-pretreated rats (n=6). The percent maximum effects were 78.4 ± 10.2 and 74.7 ± 7.2 in physiological saline- and physostigmine- pretreated groups, respectively. Comparison of these data did not produce a statistical significant difference (p=0.8749).

Another group of rats received atropine sulfate pretreatment before lamotrigine injection (n=6) and the percent maximum GABA response was calculated as 85.5 ± 13.1. No statistical significant difference was found between physiological salineand atropine sulfate- pretreated groups (p=0.6354).

Reference

1) Bazil CW. New antiepileptic drugs. Neurology, 8:71–81, 2002.

2) Kwan P, Sills GJ, Brodie MJ. The mechanism of action of commonly used antiepileptic drugs. Pharmacol Ther, 90:21–34, 2001.

3) Deckers CLP, Genton P, Sills GJ, Schmidt D. Current limitations of antiepileptic drug therapy: a conference review. Epilepsy Res, 53:1–17, 2003.

4) Ferrie CD, Panayiotopoulos CP: Therapeutic interaction of lamotrigine and sodium valproate in intractable myoclonic epilepsy. Seizure, 3:157–159, 1994.

5) Ferrie CD, Robinson RO, Knott C, Panayiotopoulos CP. Lamotrigine as an add-on drug in typical absence seizures. Acta Neurol Scand, 91:200–202, 1995.

6) Panayiotopoulos CP, CD Ferrie, C Knott, RO Robinson: Interaction of lamotrigine with sodium valproate. Lancet, 41:445, 1993.

7) Pisani F, Di Perri R, Perucca E, Richens A. Interaction of lamotrigine with sodium valproate. Lancet, 341:1224,1993.

8) Pisani F, Oteri G, Russo MF, Di Perri R, Perucca R, Richens A. The efficacy of valproatelamotrigine comedication in refactory complex partial seizures: evidence for a pharmacodynamic interaction. Epilepsia, 40:1141–1146, 1999.

9) Messenheimer JA. Lamotrigine. Epilepsia, 36:87–94, 1995.

10) Calabrese JR, Bowden CL, Sachs GS, Ascher JA, Monaghan E, Rudd GD. A double-blind placebo-controlled study of lamotrigine monotherapy in outpatients with bipolar I depression. Lamictal 602 Study Group. J Clin Psychiatry, 60:79–88, 1999.

11) Calabrese JR, Suppes T, Bowden CL, Sachs GS, Swann AC, McElroy SL, et al.: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, prophylaxis study of lamotrigine in rapid-cycling bipolar disorder. Lamictal 614 Study Group. J Clin Psychiatry, 61:841–850, 2000.

12) Frye MA, Ketter TA, Kimbrell TA, Dunn RT, Speer AM, Osuch EA et al.: A placebo-controlled study of lamotrigine and gabapentin monotherapy in refractory mood disorders. J Clin Psychopharmacol, 20:607–614,2000.

13) Bowden CL, Calabrese JR, Sachs GS, Yatham LN, Asghar SA, Montgomery P, et al. A placebo-controlled 18-month trial of lamotrigine and lithium maintenance treatment in recently manic or hypomanic patients with bipolar disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 60:392-400, 2003.

14) Eriksson AS, O'Connor WT. Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid amino acids in young patients with generalised refractory epilepsy during an add-on study with lamotrigine. Epilepsy Res, 34:75–83, 1999.

15) Kuzniecky R, Ho S, Pan J, Martin R, Gilliam F, Faught E, et al. Modulation of cerebral GABA by topiramate, lamotrigine, and gabapentin in healthy adults. Neurology, 58:368–372, 2002.

16) Lees G, Leach MJ. Studies on the mechanism of action of the novel anticonvulsant lamotrigine (Lamactil) using primary neurological cultures from rat cortex. Brain Res, 612:190–199, 1993.

17) Waldmeier PC, Baumann PA, Wick P, Feldtrauer JJ, Stierlin C, Scmutz M. Similar potency of carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine in inhibiting the release of glutamate and other neurotransmitters. Neurology, 45:1907–1913, 1995.

18) Waldmeier PC, Martin P, Stocklin K, Portet C, Scmutz M. Effect of carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine on the increase in extracellular glutamate elicited by veratridine in rat cortex and striatum. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol, 354:164–172, 1996.

19) Wang SJ, Sibra TS, Gean PW. Lamotrigine inhibition of glutamate release from isolated cerebrocortical nerve terminals (synaptosomes) by suppression of voltage-activated calcium channel activity. NeuroReport, 2:2255–2258, 2001.

20) Cunningham MO, Jones RSG. The anticonvulsant, lamotrigine decreases spontaneous glutamate release but increases spontaneous GABA release in the rat entorhinal cortex in vivo. Neuropharmacology, 39:2139–2141, 2000.

21) Cunningham MO, Wood SJ, Dhillon A, Jones RSG. Reciprocal modulation of glutamate and GABA release may underlie the anticonvulsant effect of phenytoin. Neuroscience, 95:343–351, 2000.

22) Braga MF, Aroniadou-Anderjaska V, Post RM, Li H. Lamotrigine reduces spontaneous and evoked GABAA receptormediated synaptic transmission in the basolateral amygdala: implications for its effects in seizure and affective disorders. Neuropharmacology, 42:522–529, 2002.

23) Hassel B, Tauboll E, Gjerstad L. Chronic lamotrigine treatment increases rat hippocampal GABA shunt activity and elevates cerebral taurine levels. Epilepsy Res, 43:153–163, 2001.

24) Tanganelli S, Bianchi C, Beani L. The modulation of cortical acetylcholine release by GABA, GABAlike drugs and benzodiazepines in freely moving guineapigs. Neuropharmacology, 24:291–299, 1985.

25) Bianchi C, Tanganelli S, Marzola G, Beani L. GABA induced changes in acetylcholine release from slices of guinea-pig brain. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol, 318:253–258, 1982.

26) McCormick DA, Prince DA. Mechanisms of action of acetylcholine in the guinea pig cerebral cortex in vitro. J Physiol, 375:169–194, 1986.

27) Raiteri M, Marchi M, Paudice P, Pittaluga A. Muscarinic receptors mediating inhibition of y-aminobutyric acid release in rat corpus striatum and their pharmacological characterization. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 254:496–501, 1990.

28) Hasuo H, Gallager JP, Shinnick-Gallager P. Disinhibition in the rat septum mediated by M1 muscarinic receptors. Brain Res, 438:323-327, 1988.

29) Shirakawa J, Taniyama K, lwai S, Tanaka C. Regulation [3H] GABA release from strips of guinea pig urinary bladder. Am J Physiol, 255:888-893, 1988.

30) Yananli H, Gören MZ, Berkman K, Aricioğlu F. Effect of agmatine on brain L-citrulline production during morphine withdrawal in rats: a microdialysis study in nucleus accumbens. Brain Res, 1132:51-58, 2007.

31) Paxinos G, Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates, ed 2. London Academic Press 1986.

32) Yananli HR, Terzioğlu B, Goren MZ, Aker RG, Aypak C, Onat FY. Extracellular hypothalamic gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and L-glutamic acid concentrations in response to bicuculline in a genetic absence epilepsy rat model. J Pharmacol Sci, 106:301-309, 2008.

33) PL Wheatley, AA Miller. Effects of lamotrigine on electrically induced afterdischarge duration in anaes. thetised rat, dog, and marmoset. Epilepsia, 30:34–40, 1989.

34) Morris RG, Black AB, Harris AL, Batty AB, Sallustio BC. Lamotrigine and therapeutic drug monitoring: retrospective survey following the introduction of a routine service. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 46:547–551, 1998.

35) Walker MC, Tong X, Perry H, Alavijeh MS, Patsalos PN. Comparison of serum, cerebrospinal fluid and brain extracellular fluid pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine. Br J Pharmacol, 130:242–248, 2000.

36) Walton NY, Jaing Q, Hyun B, Treiman DM. Lamotrigine vs. phenytoin for treatment of status epilepticus: comparison in an experimental model. Epilepsy Res, 24:19–28, 1996.

37) Parsons DN, Dickins M, Morley TJ. Lamotrigine: absorption, distribution, and excretion. In: Levy, R.H., Mattson, R.H., Meldrum, B.S. Antiepileptic Drugs, Raven Press, New York, 1995. pp 877– 881.

38) Leach MJ, Marden CM, Miller AA. Pharmacological studies on lamotrigine, a novel potential antiepileptic drug: II. Neurochemical studies on the mechanism of action. Epilepsia, 27:490–497, 1986.

39) Cheung H, Kamp D, Harris E. An in vitro investigation of the action of lamotrigine on neuronal voltage-activated sodium channels. Epilepsy Res, 13:107–112, 1992.

40) Lang DG, Wang CM, Cooper BR. Lamotrigine, phenytoin and carbamazepine interactions on the sodium current present in N4TG1 mouse neuroblastoma cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 266:829–835, 1993.

41) Xie X, Lancaster B, Peakman T, Garthwaite J. Interaction of the antiepileptic drug lamotrigine with recombinant rat brain type IIA Na channels and with native Na channels in rat hippocampal neurones. Pflugers Arch, 430:437–446, 1995.

42) Lizasoain I, Knowles RG, Moncada S. Inhibition by lamotrigine of the generation of nitric oxide in rat forebrain slices. J Neurochem, 64:636–642, 1995.

43) Mikati MA, Holmes GL. Lamotrigine in absence and primary generalized epilepsies. J Child Neurol. Suppl, 1:29-37, 1997.

44) Ahmad S, Fowler LJ, Whitton PS. Effects of acute and chronic lamotrigine treatment on basal and stimulated extracellular amino acids in the hippocampus of freely moving rats. Brain Res, 1029:41-47, 2004.

45) Van Der Zee EA, Luiten PGM. Cholinergic and GABAergic neurons in the rat medial septum express muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Brain Res, 652:263–268, 1994.

46) De Boer P, Westerink BCH. GABAergic modulation of striatal cholinergic interneurons: An in vivo microdialysis study. J Neurochem, 62:70–75, 1994.

47) Tellioglu T, Akin S, Ozkutlu U, Oktay S, Onat F. The role of brain acetylcholine in GABAA receptor antagonist-induced blood-pressure changes in rat. Eur J Pharmacol, 317:301-307, 1996.

48) Onat F, Tellioglu T, Aker R, Goren Z, Iskender E, Oktay S. Effect of muscimol on cholinomimetic-induced cardiovascular responses in rats. Eur J Pharmacol, 362:173-181, 1988.

49) Kayadjanian N, Menetrey A, Besson MJ. Activation of muscarinic receptors stimulates GABA release in the rat globus pallidus. Synapse, 26:131–139, 1997.

50) Baba H, Kohno H, Okamoto M, Goldstein PA, Shimoji K, Yoshimura M. Muscarinic facilitation of GABA release in substantia gelatinosa of the rat spinal dorsal horn. J Physiol, 508:83-93, 1998.

51) Grillner P, Berretta N, Bernardi G, Svensson TH, Mercuri NB. Muscarinic receptors depress GABAergic synaptic transmission in rat midbrain dopamine neurons. Neuroscience, 96:299–307, 2000.

Marmara University